🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.